Recognizable situations

Where technical SEO conversations tend to fall apart.

These scenarios come up often enough that they're worth naming directly. None of them mean you've done anything wrong, they're just common gaps between a non-technical owner and a technical implementer.

1

"My developer says the site is fine, but pages still aren't showing up."

This usually points to a mismatch between "the site loads correctly" and "the site is indexed correctly." A page can render perfectly in a browser while still being blocked from indexing by a leftover noindex tag, a canonical pointing elsewhere, or a robots.txt rule nobody remembered to remove after launch.

What helps here is asking specifically about indexation status, not just page functionality. A direct question like "can you check the Index Coverage report for this URL" moves the conversation from a general reassurance to a checkable fact.

2

"Every speed tool gives me a different number."

Different tools measure different things, at different times, from different simulated conditions. A mobile lab test can look very different from real-world field data collected from actual visitors over the past 28 days. Neither number is wrong, they're just answering slightly different questions.

Rather than chasing a single perfect score, it tends to help more to track whether a metric is trending in a consistent direction over several weeks, and to ask your developer which data source they're referencing before reacting to any one report.

3

"We paid for structured data, how do I know it's actually there?"

Structured data lives in the page's underlying code and isn't visible just by looking at the rendered page. It's entirely possible for a site to look complete while the schema markup is missing, malformed, or only partially implemented across page types.

A structured data testing tool can confirm what's actually present on a live URL. Asking for a screenshot or export from that tool, rather than a verbal confirmation, gives you something concrete to reference later if questions come up.

4

"After our redesign, our search traffic dropped and nobody can tell me why."

Redesigns and platform migrations are a common point where technical SEO issues appear, often because URL structures change, redirects are missed, or old pages simply disappear without a replacement being indexed in time.

It helps to ask, before a redesign launches, whether a redirect map has been created for existing indexed URLs, and to request a before-and-after comparison of indexed page counts once the new site is live.

Small team gathered around a whiteboard mapping out website issues and priorities

Naming the specific concept involved, crawlability, speed, structured data, or indexation, turns a vague frustration into a conversation someone can actually act on.

Website owner handing a written brief to a freelance developer across a cafe table

A short written brief, even a few sentences, tends to travel better between meetings than a verbal description that gets paraphrased twice.

One more scenario worth naming

"Our analytics and our developer's report don't match."

Analytics platforms and technical SEO tools often measure different things using different methods, so small discrepancies between them are normal rather than alarming. Analytics typically reflects visitor behavior, while crawl and index reports reflect what a search engine has actually discovered and stored.

When the two seem to conflict sharply, it's usually worth asking which date range and which property (www versus non-www, http versus https) each report is pulling from, since a mismatch there is a frequent, mundane explanation.

Recognize your own situation in one of these?

The course and webinars go deeper into each scenario, including the specific questions and checklists that tend to move things forward.

Get in touch